Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Multimodel Donne Annotation: Stage 1

XII.

Why are we by all creatures waited on ?
Why do the prodigal elements supply
Life and food to me, being more pure than I,
Simpler and further from corruption ?
Why brook'st thou, ignorant horse, subjection ?
Why dost thou, bull and boar, so sillily
Dissemble weakness, and by one man's stroke die,
Whose whole kind you might swallow and feed upon ?
Weaker I am, woe's me, and worse than you ;
You have not sinn'd, nor need be timorous.
But wonder at a greater, for to us
Created nature doth these things subdue ;
But their Creator, whom sin, nor nature tied,
For us, His creatures, and His foes, hath died.

Source:
Donne, John. Poems of John Donne. vol I.
E. K. Chambers, ed.
London: Lawrence & Bullen, 1896. 164.

Outside Sources:

1)
Fenner, Arthur. "Donne's Holy Sonnet XII". Explicator (1982): 14-15.
MLA International Bibliography. Web. 2 March 2010.
The source comes from Arthur Fenner of West Harwich, Massachusetts.
He evaluates the text of Sonnet XII and determines how it relates to the
other sonnets by Donne. Fenner goes into much detail explaining how
sonnet XII contains a structure of explicit argument. The poem does
not have any detailed imagery and very little figurative speech. He also
believes the poem revolves around three terms: Elements, Man, and Animals.

2)
Simpson, Arthur L., Jr. "Donne's Holy Sonnets, XII". Explicator (1969): 27. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 2 March 2010.
I have yet to receive a copy of this article but I did request it through Tech's library. The source comes straight from the schools archives, so it should be a great source.

3)
Grant, Patrick. "Donne, Pico, and Holy Sonnet XII". Humanities Association Review (1973): 39-42. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 2 MArch 2010.
The author, Patrick Grant, explores the in-depth meaning of Donne's Sonnet XII as a more of a review for English Literature. The source goes through each line and breaks each word down in those lines revealing a connection between the different elements discussed in the poem.

4)
Grenander, M. E. "Donne's Holy Sonnets, XII". Explicator (1955): 42. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 2 March 2010.
Grenander has analyzed many Shakespearian plays as well as Donne's Sonnets. He provides a clear explanation and relationship between the elements and structure of the poem. He goes into detail about how the line formation, punctuation, and syllable positioning helps emphasize Donne's argument. According to Grenander, Holy Sonnet XII is very different from the rest of the sonnets.

5)
Bellette, Anthony F. "Little Worlds Made Cunningly: Significant Form in Donne's 'Holy Sonnets' and 'Goodfriday, 1613'". Studies in Philology, Vol. 72, No. 3. University of North Carolina Press: 1975. 322-347.
The author, Anthony Bellette, examines how John Donne's sonnets are different than the rest of his secular poetry. I believe the intended audience would have to be a scholarly crowd or college student seeking help on analysis. His main idea is to discuss the importance of Sonnet XII's form and structure which is not usually analyzed among other sources. He states that the nature of adaptation closely reflects the nature of the experience described.

2 comments:

  1. You did a lot of good things here, but I'm just gonna focus on what you need to add or improve.

    Of course, you will need to write an annotation for your second source listed.

    For all of your sources, be more specific on how you are going to utilize it. When you describe it, it is pretty clear what the subject matter is, and the reader knows you will use that, but "how" is more important. For this aspect, keep in mind that this project is multi-modal. For example, will you introduce this source along with a picture or video? Will be a certain size, shape, or color?

    Also, think about the connections between your sources. If there are none, then say it in your annotations. That means each one introduces a new independent idea, which can be good. But if they are related, then definitely discuss this. How does one enhance another, or how does one enhance all the rest of the sources? This may also influence the concept for or layout of your final product.

    One final thing is be more clear regarding how you interpret the credibility of all your sources. Just because they are very credible doesn't mean the reader can assume this. State why each is credible, or if it is not quite so credible, state why you are critical of it and/or why that lack of credibility does not render the source useless to your project.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well TJ pretty much summed up a bunch of what I was gonna say so I won't repeat it. Here are a couple more pointers which I thought might help.

    You might want to discuss who the author is for credibility. Maybe education level?

    You also might want to include more in terms of credibility of the journals that the article was posted on. Discuss what kind of source the article was on.

    ReplyDelete