Friday, March 5, 2010

Multimodel Donne Annotation: Stage 2

XII.

Why are we by all creatures waited on ?
Why do the prodigal elements supply
Life and food to me, being more pure than I,
Simpler and further from corruption ?
Why brook'st thou, ignorant horse, subjection ?
Why dost thou, bull and boar, so sillily
Dissemble weakness, and by one man's stroke die,
Whose whole kind you might swallow and feed upon ?
Weaker I am, woe's me, and worse than you ;
You have not sinn'd, nor need be timorous.
But wonder at a greater, for to us
Created nature doth these things subdue ;
But their Creator, whom sin, nor nature tied,
For us, His creatures, and His foes, hath died.

Source:
Donne, John. Poems of John Donne. vol I.
E. K. Chambers, ed.
London: Lawrence & Bullen, 1896. 164.

Outside Sources:

1)
Fenner, Arthur. "Donne's Holy Sonnet XII". Explicator (1982): 14-15.
MLA International Bibliography. Web. 2 March 2010.
The source comes from Arthur Fenner of West Harwich, Massachusetts. The intended audience would be other literary scholars or college students seeking an analysis. The source has been reviewed by Explicator and has been around in a highly resourceful database proving its credibility.
He evaluates the text of Sonnet XII and determines how it relates to the
other sonnets by Donne. Fenner goes into much detail explaining how
sonnet XII contains a structure of explicit argument. The poem does
not have any detailed imagery and very little figurative speech. He also
believes the poem revolves around three terms: Elements, Man, and Animals. This articles reflects on the differences Sonnet XII has in comparison to the other sonnets. It will help me build a foundation for my other sources to feed off of.

2)
Simpson, Arthur L., Jr. "Donne's Holy Sonnets, XII". Explicator (1969): 27. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 2 March 2010.
The author Arthur Simpson focuses mainly on the

3)
Grant, Patrick. "Donne, Pico, and Holy Sonnet XII". Humanities Association Review (1973): 39-42. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 2 MArch 2010.
The author, Patrick Grant, explores the in-depth meaning of Donne's Sonnet XII as a more of a review for English Literature. The source goes through each line and breaks each word down in those lines revealing a connection between the different elements discussed in the poem.

4)
Grenander, M. E. "Donne's Holy Sonnets, XII". Explicator (1955): 42. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 2 March 2010.
Grenander has analyzed many Shakespearian plays as well as Donne's Sonnets. He provides a clear explanation and relationship between the elements and structure of the poem. He goes into detail about how the line formation, punctuation, and syllable positioning helps emphasize Donne's argument. According to Grenander, Holy Sonnet XII is very different from the rest of the sonnets.

5)
Bellette, Anthony F. "Little Worlds Made Cunningly: Significant Form in Donne's 'Holy Sonnets' and 'Goodfriday, 1613'". Studies in Philology, Vol. 72, No. 3. University of North Carolina Press: 1975. 322-347.
The author, Anthony Bellette, examines how John Donne's sonnets are different than the rest of his secular poetry. I believe the intended audience would have to be a scholarly crowd or college student seeking help on analysis. His main idea is to discuss the importance of Sonnet XII's form and structure which is not usually analyzed among other sources. He states that the nature of adaptation closely reflects the nature of the experience described.

2 comments:

  1. Your 1st annotation is much better. It gives a much better credibility towards the source than before. Your other sources still need a little work towards how you are going to use the source as well as the credibility of your sources. Also, you might want to start thinking about how you are going to display the final copy. For example, maybe a website with moving graphics.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well, of course, be sure to complete your annotations. So far, this looks pretty good. Make sure you include all the necessary elements of an annotation in each one, but that's all just procedural. Also, like Asato mentioned, you didn't really present any ideas regarding your presentation. Make sure you have a reasonable vision for that.

    It appears that you will be very concerned with structure and meanings. This is good, because your sources can mostly all work very well with each other. They will emphasize each other sometimes, and they will conflict with other at other times. Use this to get your main poiint across in your annotation. Because your sources are similar though, you should put some thought perhaps into where each will fit into your final presentation. Will you associate sources with specific parts of the sonnet or will you annotate in a more general sense?

    I think you have the necessary content. Just make sure you organize it and present it well.

    ReplyDelete